2024

Novel purification strategies for lipid nanoparticles building blocks

by cyb2025

ALEXANDER KLAIBER, UWE ALBRECHT, MARKUS JUZA*
*Corresponding author
CordenPharma Switzerland LLC, Liestal, Switzerland

ABSTRACT

Synthetic lipids have recently been used with great success in mRNA lipid nanoparticles (LNP) formulations, which has greatly increased their demand. Chromatography still remains a standard unit operation in the purification of these lipids. However, traditional normal phase chromatography often uses large amounts of toxic solvents, including chlorinated ones. In this article we present three case studies demonstrating alternative methods to achieve greater sustainability and/or reduce both environmental impact and operational cost. These methods include aqueous/non-aqueous reversed-phase chromatography (NARP) as well as super critical fluid chromatography (SFC).

INTRODUCTION
Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) became widely known in the COVID-19 pandemic by playing a major role in the development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (1).
Nowadays, LNPs are one of the most commonly used tools for xRNA (2, 3) and xDNA delivery (4). LNPs usually consist of five components, ionizable lipids, phospholipids, cholesterols, pegylated lipids, and the payload, each of them adding unique properties to the structure of the LNP. Therefore, synthetic lipids as well as lipid conjugates have been gaining significant importance in recent years as drug target, therapeutic molecules, and liposomes.

 

Traditionally such molecules are purified by normal phase chromatography on silica using large volume of toxic solvents, including chlorinated solvents. As CDMO and producer of numerous lipids CordenPharma accepted the challenge of reducing organic solvent usage and developing greener processes. Ways to achieve this goal include aqueous/non-aqueous reversed-phase chromatography (NARP) (5, 6) and super critical fluid chromatography (SFC) that can be considered to supplant organic solvents (7) with more benign alternatives. In SFC, the mobile phase consists of a supercritical fluid like carbon dioxide replacing commonly used organic solvents.
SFC shows several benefits compared to HPLC. The polarity of supercritical carbon dioxide is similar to n-heptane, and it is miscible with most organic solvents, allowing to tune the polarity of the solvent. Due to its low viscosity and high diffusivity chromatographic processes are much faster as in HPLC, reducing run times significantly. Also, in economic regard SFC plays an important role by decreasing solvent costs. CO2 is non-toxic, non-flammable, and readily available, making SFC an environmentally benign alternative to other solvent-based chromatography methods.

 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Dr. Markus Juza studied in Stuttgart, Germany, and received his doctorate in Tübingen in the field of enantioselective chromatographic methods in GC, HPLC, SFC and CE.
After a post-doctoral stay at the ETH in Zürich with Professor Morbidelli, Mr. Juza headed the preparative HPLC / SMB department for companies in Switzerland and France for over a decade before returning to analytical work in the field of pharmaceuticals and nutritionals again.
Since 2015, Mr. Juza is working with Corden Pharma Switzerland as a Team Leader for Purification Technology.

Login